When I was in middle school I was constantly sent to the principal’s office. Not for bad behavior or bad grades but because I was out of dress code. Somedays it was because my shorts were too short, or my tank top was not properly covering my shoulders. My skin was showing in places considered distracting to my male classmates by the school board. At my particular middle school, if you were caught out of dress code your parents could either bring you a more “appropriate” article of clothing or you were sent to ISS (In School Suspension). Since my parents worked full time jobs they were never able to leave work and bring me a change of clothes. So I spent those days in ISS doing packets of busy work, missing out on a full day of learning. Thinking back on it now, it was a tad ridiculous. But back then I didn’t really think too much into it. I kind of accepted it. That those were the rules.
With dress code, boys and girls are judged by different standards. |
Instead of blaming women, blame the man. "Rape is rape." |
The
enforcement of dress code in public schools suggest a number of things. We
constantly see that girls are more harshly critiqued than boys when it comes to
dress code. As a girl, I was told to cover my legs, cover my shoulders, cover
my waist, and cover my belly. Whereas for boys, they are typically only penalized
for wearing a hat or if their pants are sagging. It’s no secret that boy and
girls are judged by different standards. Girls are told to keep themselves
covered up because it distracts boys, which prioritizes boys’ education over
their own. Every time I was sent to ISS my education was compromised
because my shoulders and thighs were showing. It sent the message to me subconsciously
that the way I was dressed was valued more than my education, that I needed to
keep myself covered to stay out of trouble and if I wanted to avoid unwanted to
male attention, then I also needed to dress “humbly”. Dress code tells us that
boys are "beholden and accountable to no one," in regards to their behavior and that girls must dress “right” to
protect themselves from harmful advances made by boys (Kimmel 7).
These
ideas promoted through dress code regulation are often carried into adulthood.
After being bombarded with them over the years by authority figures in our
schools they become legitimized and embedded into our minds. But these ideas don’t
stop with secondary education as adults we see the same type of policing of
women’s bodies. Seen in rape culture and legislation response to reproductive
rights. Despite the hyper sexual images we see in the media, the
objectification of women’s bodies to sell a product and women being told countless times that "covenantal beauty is her only attribute," women are still put to
blame when our bodies are violated because ‘we asked for it” (Killbourne 122). Which is ridiculous,
because “rape is rape.” Just as we were
told in middle school when we wore those short shorts and distracted you’re
male classmates.
The
same can be said about the United States struggle with abortion and reproductive
rights. Even though abortion in the United States is no longer illegal, there
are many obstacles in place to prevent women from getting one. Such as counseling,
no access, and others. Many politicians who are typically white males fight to
prevent women the right to make choices regarding their bodies. They are
typically ill informed about how the female body works, and have irrational arguments
to support their views. Not only do these views include anti-abortion, they
also include birth control. Making birth control had to obtain, and even creating
ideas that it is shameful or looked down upon. The same can be said about sex
education, many states lack in proper sex education. And many states in the
south don’t teach sex education, but absence. And since the United States doesn’t
regulate on a federal level what each state teaches in sex education, some
school don’t receive sex education at all. These politicians are typically blurring the lines between
religion and state. But the debate over reproductive rights in some ways is a
smoke screen to maintain power and control. Regardless though, it promotes the
idea that women are not intelligent enough to decide what is best for their own bodies, life, and health.
However,
there are groups who are fighting against this small, yet loud minority. Such as Planned Parenthood, who provided a variety of health services to women and men
including abortion.
Works Cited:
Michael Kimmel: Misfaming Men
Jean Kilbourne : Beauty and the Beast of Advertising
Roxane Gay: The Alienable Rights of Women
No comments:
Post a Comment