Media images are controlled images. They are purposefully constructed to grab or direct the attention of an audience. To direct the audience, the use of a gaze is employed. This gaze is meant not only to hold the attention of the audience, but also to denote relationships between characters on screen. As it stands now, the gaze that is employed to do so, is called the "male gaze." This gaze is exclusionary and does not allow for each viewer to take part in the pleasure of viewing equally. In fact, as Laura Mulvey and John Berger, both prominent feminist writers, conclude the male gaze only engages men (white heterosexual men) and unjustly uses women (white heterosexual women) as a way to fuel the male ego. While Laura Mulvey’s Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema describes the male gaze in the context of cinema, John Berger’s Ways of Seeing gives multiple examples of the gaze in action in the category of oil painting known as the nudes. It is only through the juxtaposition of race and gender that a different gaze, an oppositional gaze, is formed. This oppositional gaze, which is further explained by Bell Hooks in The Oppositional Gaze: Black Female Spectatorship, is slowly being put to use in media today.
various example of the male gaze in cinema, advertising, etc. |
In
Laura Mulvey’s essay Visual Pleasure and Cinema Narrative, she
states that through the male gaze men become “bearers of the look of the
spectator (838).” That is to say that the eyes of the audience are directed by
the male on screen. She goes on the say that due to this relationship the male
has power and can command the space around him. “ As the spectator identifies
with the main male protagonist, he projects his look on to that of his like,
his screen surrogate, so that the power of the male protagonist as he controls
events coincides with the active power of the erotic look, both giving a satisfying
sense of omnipotence (Mulvey 838).” Mulvey inherently states that as the spectator,
a male, relates to the male figure on screen the spectator places himself himself
in a position of power. I presume the reason that this relationship exists is
because of relatability—people can relate to those of similar origin. As a result
the man that feels free to command will, identify with the male protagonist
that is also free to command. In contrast, she asserts that women that are viewed
through this gaze are “passive images” whose bodies are turned into objects
that “[play] to and [signify] male desire (Mulvey 837).” These women do not
exist on their own. They have no agency for themselves, and their bodies are
“displayed for men’s enjoyment (Mulvey 839),” never their own. Viewed through
the male gaze, the presence of a woman is dependent on the relationship she has
with the male.
The
male gaze that Laura Mulvey describes is such a pervasive way of seeing because
it has been continually employed in various media forms. I believe the gaze has
been reused so many times because these media, painting, video, cinema, and so
on have all been male dominated or have simply catered to men, a white
heterosexual man. In John Berger Ways of Seeing, he analyzes how
oil paintings, a very traditional media, employ
the same male gaze in
regards to the category of the nude. However, he does make convincing parallels
of the nudes from early renaissance to the representation of women in
advertising and pornography (Berger 36-42, 55). These nudes and even the
women from advertisements and nude photographs were reduced to their bodies.
They existed for the purpose of the spectator-owner (male) that commissioned
such images. The body of the nude, and all those that follow the example, was
arranged in a way to be seen. The image of the nudes’ body was meant to “appeal
to the [man’s] sexuality. [The image] had nothing to do with her sexuality
(Berger 55).” The woman exists to affirm the spectator’s view, ownership, and
manhood. She has no agency of her own.
A visual comparison from Ways of Seeing, between Ingres's La Grande Odalisque (1814) and a pinup: "Is not the expression remarkably similar in each case? |
Archetype of a black woman that cared for the children of a white family |
While Mulvey and Berger seem to echo one another’s ideas, they do not
consider how other factors such as race, class, and sexual relations inform
spectatorship (Hooks 117). Mulvey, while she uses the word women does not
insist that the race of a woman plays a part in the male gaze, nor does Berger.
The examples of the male gaze in action that Mulvey and Berger give are all of
white women. Therefore, this male gaze is epitomizing white womanhood, even while
turning white women into objects of desire. What then is the role of a woman of
color in the male gaze? Bell Hooks writes that the representation of black
females in film were either “to enhance and maintain white womanhood (119)”
(which introduced the image of the Mammy), or “to soften the image of black
men, to
The Sapphire Archetype is meant to emasculate Black men. Black female are domineering and masculine in this archetype |
Some highly skilled female Martial artists(?) from manga series History's Strongest Disciple Kenichi |
I as
a media consumer have seen countless examples of the male gaze being used on
women. Manga, anime, comic books, video games, and movies were all my favorite
ways of escaping reality for a moment. However, as I grew older I noticed that
depictions and story lines concerning women were all so similar that they could
have been identical if not for the medium used. The woman always inspired
action in her male counterparts, but never took action herself. For every
zoom in on an ample bosom gleefully “boing-ing” or bouncing in manga/anime
there was one for a movie. For every camera that painstakingly outlined the
legs of a woman, or every seen shot taken between a woman’s legs there was one in a video game. I as a young woman saw these images so often that they did not
shock me after a while. It is only recently that I have snapped out of my
numbness. In regards to consuming media as a black female, I learned at a very
early age that finding a convincing representation of a black woman in any
media was nearly impossible. When it came to black women/girls, they were
angry, loud, high school dropouts, unwanted, and unloved. They were Mammies,
Jezebels, and Sapphires in makeovers. They were stereotypes stacked on stereotypes.
They were never black women. However, I never turned away from media that did
not include the presence of black females or represented black females
negatively. I considered those moments as a learning experiences for when I
decide to make my own media, my own characters--my own representation.
Works Cited :
-Laura Mulvey Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema
-John Berger Ways of Seeing
-Bell Hooks The Oppositional Gaze: Black Female Spectatorship
-Laura Mulvey Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema
-John Berger Ways of Seeing
-Bell Hooks The Oppositional Gaze: Black Female Spectatorship
No comments:
Post a Comment